Check Point has patched two critical vulnerabilities in the way its firewall and management products handle VPN certificates. The company says both could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to run code, but only "under specific conditions" that it has not described. One flaw affects Check Point's Security Gateways, its firewall appliances. The other affects those gateways and the Security
Cybersecurity News and Vulnerability Aggregator
Cybersecurity news aggregator
treemd <(curl -sL https://allsec.sh/md) (as Markdown) Top Cybersecurity Stories Today
A suspected Russian-speaking cyber actor has been attributed to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to devise exploits targeting a recently disclosed pair of security flaws in PaperCut NG/MF and break into hundreds of instances. According to independent reports from Blackpoint Cyber and GreyNoise, the activity originates from "45.142.193[.]132," an IP address that has been linked to
The City Attorney’s Office has asked Meta to explain how the harmful ads repeatedly ran on Facebook and Instagram. The company claims the ads are not under the city’s jurisdiction.
Before you sign with a penetration testing vendor, ask precise questions that turn marketing claims into measurable commitments. Confirm exact scope, learn which work is automated, AI-led, or human-led, and require that findings get reproduced and validated before they reach a report. Ask who can access your environment, how testers are vetted, and what the rules of engagement and stop conditions look like. Review sample reports, confirm remediation and retesting terms, and normalize every cost. Place every material promise in the contract rather than a slide deck. The post Questions to Ask a Penetration Testing Vendor Before You Sign appeared first on Synack .
Multiple espionage-motivated threat activity clusters have been found deploying a previously undocumented exploit kit called BlueMoon that chains together multiple vulnerabilities in Microsoft Windows and Google Chrome. The first in-the-wild use of BlueMoon has been attributed to the China-aligned state-sponsored group tracked as APT31 (aka Bronze Vinewood, Judgement Panda, JungleBamboo,
Latest
Open Skies: How a Few Small Mistakes Can Hand an Attacker the Keys to Your Infrastructure — and Expose All Your Customer Data
A few months ago I discovered a critical security issue in an airline's website, resulting in customer data exposure. I'm sharing this here so my findings are "on the record", and the community can see what kinds of risks they should be looking out for when securing their systems. **Please refrain from attempting to identify the airline.** I hope to be able to share who they are on conclusion of the ICO investigation. I'm very interested in hearing from Microsoft Azure admins, as to whether I've understated or overstated the issues.
Hey everyone, I just released a major update (v2.1.0) for **ThreatLens**. For this release, the focus was entirely on security hardening, data validation, and core performance. **What's new in v2.1.0?** * **Strict Security:** Blocked Excel/CSV formula injections in generated reports, prevented API key leaks in logs, and enforced strict IOC validation. * **Performance Boost:** Integrated a local SQLite cache to persist investigation data, significantly reducing redundant API calls. * **Smarter Analysis:** Introduced an explainable verdict system with confidence scores. Ambiguous results are now correctly classified as "Unknown" rather than "Clean". * **Resource Management:** Added intelligent API quota planning, connection timeouts, automatic retries, and file size limits. **What is ThreatLens?** For those who haven't seen it before, ThreatLens is an open-source CLI tool built to automate Threat Intelligence and OSINT workflows. It takes Indicators of Compromise (IPs, domains, hashes, CVEs), queries multiple sources simultaneously, and generates structured, safe, and ready-to-use reports. It's completely open-source. I'd love to hear your feedback or feature requests! **Check it out on GitHub:** [https://github.com/AbdaullahAG/ThreatLens](https://github.com/AbdaullahAG/ThreatLens) I’d love to hear your thoughts, feedback, or feature requests!
🕵️♂️ Hackers exploit SonicWall SMA1000 flaw to steal Active Directory credentials from orgs in multiple countries
[Hunt.io](http://Hunt.io) just published research on an operator mass-exploiting CVE-2026-15409, an unauthenticated SSRF in SonicWall SMA1000 appliances rated CVSS 10. Exploitation began within two days of SonicWall's 14 July disclosure. The operator deployed a standalone Linux build of Impacket's secretsdump onto compromised appliances and used them to reach internal domain controllers, recovering credentials from at least 9 Active Directory domains and performing full DCSync against 5 environments. Confirmed victims span France, India, Italy and the US. The cyberattack disclosed by King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council on 17 July is linked at moderate confidence. [Hunt.io](http://Hunt.io) notified the NCSC and relevant national CERTs before publishing. Full writeup below. [https://hunt.io/blog/sonicwall-sma1000-uk-council-attack](https://hunt.io/blog/sonicwall-sma1000-uk-council-attack)
🕵️♂️ 🏴 A UK council breach reported in July turned out to be one of many, tied to mass SonicWall exploitation
When King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council disclosed a cyberattack in July, it looked like a standalone incident. Research from [Hunt.io](http://Hunt.io) ties it, at moderate confidence, to a much larger operation exploiting a SonicWall SMA1000 flaw (CVE-2026-15409) across dozens of organizations, starting two days after the bug was disclosed. The operator left their toolkit exposed in an open directory, which is how the full picture came out: 250 targets, credentials stolen from at least 9 Active Directory domains, victims confirmed across France, India, Italy and the US. The council was one name on a long list and most of the others were never reported. The detail worth taking away: the credential theft ran from the SonicWall appliances themselves, the kind of device most organizations barely monitor compared to their laptops and servers. Full writeup below. [https://hunt.io/blog/sonicwall-sma1000-uk-council-attack](https://hunt.io/blog/sonicwall-sma1000-uk-council-attack)
A lot of this week’s security news has the same awkward answer to one question: “Why was that allowed to work?” An extension asks for access and takes too much. A trusted service becomes part of a phishing chain. An old bug still gets results. An exposed system stays exposed. A package looks useful right up until it isn’t. Different stories, same basic problem: the path in was often already
VU#687587: AOMEI Backupper amwrtdrv.sys local privilege escalation vulnerability allows arbitrary writes to physical disks
Overview An incorrect permissions assignment vulnerability in the amwrtdrv.sys kernel driver, included with AOMEI Backupper 8.4.0, allows an unprivileged local user to perform arbitrary writes to the physical disk. When Secure Boot is disabled, this can be leveraged to execute arbitrary UEFI-level code before the operating system loads. This allows an attacker to bypass OS-level security controls, including HVCI, EDR solutions, and Microsoft Defender. The attack may also enable capture of BitLocker Volume Master Key (VMK) material, depending on the system's BitLocker configuration. Description AOMEI Backupper from AOMEI International Network Limited is designed to provide backup and disaster recovery services. It also helps individuals and businesses to create system images, disk clones, and file backups. AOMEI Backupper is available as a Windows application and can be integrated into enterprise backup workflows or directly used by end users. CVE-2026-12780 : An Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource (CWE-732) vulnerability in the amwrtdrv.sys kernel driver used by AOMEI Backupper 8.4.0 allows an unprivileged local attacker to achieve UEFI-level arbitrary code execution by directly writing to physical disk devices. The driver creates a world-accessible device object without a security descriptor, therefore allowing any user-mode process to open the device and issue unrestricted write requests. Hence, an attacker can modify disk sectors in the pre-partition gap (LBA 34–2047), inject a malicious UEFI payload, and alter the GPT to reference the payload as an EFI System Partition. The payload can then execute during the UEFI Boot Device Selection (BDS) phase, before operating system security mechanisms are loaded. Impact
**Advisory:** [https://www.drupal.org/sa-contrib-2026-134](https://www.drupal.org/sa-contrib-2026-134)
Bad actors are misusing Google Play's Early Access program to push deceptive apps that claim to offer money, rewards, casino winnings, and premium content. Early Access apps are apps that haven't been released on the official Android app marketplace. The main idea behind the program is for developers to solicit user feedback for new applications or features they may be working on before their
I'm in a very low phase of my life and I'm spending a lot of time indoors so I'm thinking of getting another cert under my belt. The last time I felt like this was during covid lockdown and I got my Security+ and OSCP then, which finally helped me break into the cyber space. Background: 6 years in security consulting performing web app/api, mobile, network pen tests and source code reviews. I had always wanted to get Offsec's OSWE, but I already have a decent bit of experience in pen testing web apps, so I'm not sure if it'll add much value to my profile. My profile lacks anything cloud or AI related. So I was wondering if I should work towards getting [CARTP ](https://www.alteredsecurity.com/cartp)or [CARTE](https://www.alteredsecurity.com/carte) , or something AI related because I have seen an increase in demand for AI/LLM pentesting, I found that Offsec now offers [OSAI](https://www.offsec.com/courses/ai-300/) or HTB's [COAE](https://academy.hackthebox.com/preview/certifications/htb-certified-offensive-ai-expert) . Appreciate any advice or suggestions you might have!
1.1.1.1 now validates DNSSEC signatures made with ML-DSA-44 , a post-quantum signature algorithm standardized by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) . This is a first step toward preparing DNSSEC for a future in which today’s signature algorithms are no longer secure. Cloudflare plans to achieve full post-quantum security by 2029 . Much of the work so far has focused on TLS, but public-key cryptography is used in many other systems, including DNSSEC. While we began experimenting with post-quantum key agreement in TLS in 2019 and enabled support for all customers in 2022, post-quantum signatures have not yet received comparable testing in DNSSEC. There is also some urgency. Widespread client adoption of post-quantum TLS took years, partly because larger messages exposed assumptions and bugs in existing network software. That experience showed why early large-scale testing matters. We cannot wait until quantum computers become an immediate threat. The problem is that post-quantum signatures are large. Each ML-DSA-44 signature is 2,420 bytes, exceeding common DNS-over- UDP limits before the response includes anything else. At the same t
US government adviser Paul Christiano warns of risks to AI industry as he joins OpenAI’s non-profit foundation OpenAI is not on track to reduce the risk of “catastrophic” loss of control to an acceptable level, a member of its non-profit board has said, amid spreading public and political concern that super-advanced AIs could one day wipe out humanity. Paul Christiano, a US government technology adviser, said : “There is a meaningful risk that rapid acceleration in AI capabilities leads to catastrophic and irreversible loss of control in the very near term.” Continue reading...
Check Point has patched two critical vulnerabilities in the way its firewall and management products handle VPN certificates. The company says both could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to run code, but only "under specific conditions" that it has not described. One flaw affects Check Point's Security Gateways, its firewall appliances. The other affects those gateways and the Security
A suspected Russian-speaking cyber actor has been attributed to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to devise exploits targeting a recently disclosed pair of security flaws in PaperCut NG/MF and break into hundreds of instances. According to independent reports from Blackpoint Cyber and GreyNoise, the activity originates from "45.142.193[.]132," an IP address that has been linked to
The Gigabud banking trojan now installs a second Android app that creates a work profile on an infected phone and drops a tampered banking app inside it, security firm Group-IB said in a report published on September 9. A work profile is a separate space that Android typically reserves for employer apps, and what's inside it is kept separate from everything in the personal space. That
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) on Wednesday added three flaws, each impacting Cisco, Citrix, and Fortinet, to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, requiring Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to apply the patches by September 12, 2026. The vulnerabilities are listed below - CVE-2026-20079 (CVSS score: 10.0) - An authentication
InquiryIQ, a previously unreported prototype, tested a model from xAI, maker of Grok, to surface associates, social accounts, and other information about people identified through Clearview.
It Just Made the Rebuild Tax Visible. AI Is About to Delete It.“ by Albert Corzo on Medium: https://albert-corzo.medium.com/bear-c2-did-not-invent-switching-it-just-made-the-rebuild-tax-visible-ai-is-about-to-delete-it-4fa246c64b68
Nearly one in ten of the internet-facing LiteLLM servers that Wiz Research scanned in February accepted sk-1234, the example admin key in LiteLLM's own setup guide. LiteLLM is an open-source AI gateway, the software a company puts between its applications and the model providers it pays for. That key is the gateway's administrator credential. Anyone who holds it can read every
Anthropic on Wednesday disclosed a fourth incident in which its artificial intelligence (AI) model broke into real third-party systems, marking the latest in a growing list of cases that have raised concerns about the security risks posed by autonomous AI agents. The AI company said the incident dates back to January 2026 and involved an early version of Claude Opus 4.6 that breached "
The City Attorney’s Office has asked Meta to explain how the harmful ads repeatedly ran on Facebook and Instagram. The company claims the ads are not under the city’s jurisdiction.
The new Apple Watch includes several “intelligent” listening features that have privacy and security baked in. But the protections can’t change the facts of what the tools do.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) on Wednesday announced coordinated actions aimed at an illicit online marketplace called Xinbi Guarantee that offered scam services, including seizing Telegram channels used to run the service, confiscating two cryptocurrency wallets, and deploying the Scam Center Strike Force to Madagascar to help disrupt 13 scam compounds run by Chinese organized crime
Before you sign with a penetration testing vendor, ask precise questions that turn marketing claims into measurable commitments. Confirm exact scope, learn which work is automated, AI-led, or human-led, and require that findings get reproduced and validated before they reach a report. Ask who can access your environment, how testers are vetted, and what the rules of engagement and stop conditions look like. Review sample reports, confirm remediation and retesting terms, and normalize every cost. Place every material promise in the contract rather than a slide deck. The post Questions to Ask a Penetration Testing Vendor Before You Sign appeared first on Synack .
Multiple espionage-motivated threat activity clusters have been found deploying a previously undocumented exploit kit called BlueMoon that chains together multiple vulnerabilities in Microsoft Windows and Google Chrome. The first in-the-wild use of BlueMoon has been attributed to the China-aligned state-sponsored group tracked as APT31 (aka Bronze Vinewood, Judgement Panda, JungleBamboo,
A new GTA mod lets you smash and shoot Flock’s automatic license plate readers around the fictional Los Santos.
Update: Attack Shark X6 Linux driver — from DPI-only to button remap, lighting, and emergency reset (Go + Wails)
Piracy CDN renamed .ts video segments to .woff2 to abuse extension-based CDN caching, a byte-level analysis
When I started learning SOC investigations and SPL-style queries, one of the problems I ran into was finding a practical environment to actually practice the workflow. Reading about queries is useful, but I wanted to work with realistic security telemetry and go through the process of: \- Searching authentication and security events \- Identifying suspicious activity \- Aggregating and correlating events \- Creating detections \- Investigating alerts \- Pivoting between related users, hosts, and IP addresses Setting up a full SIEM environment can add a significant infrastructure and configuration overhead for someone who simply wants to practice these workflows. So I built SocQuery Lab as a browser-based training environment for experimenting with these concepts. It includes an original educational SPL-compatible query engine and realistic synthetic telemetry covering sources such as Windows security events, Linux authentication logs, DNS activity, firewall/VPN events, and PowerShell activity. The platform also includes investigation scenarios covering techniques such as: \- Brute-force authentication activity \- Password spraying \- Suspicious PowerShell execution \- DNS tunneling \- Credential compromise \- Backdoor account creation Everything runs locally in the browser, with uploaded logs processed and stored locally using IndexedDB. The goal is not to replace a production SIEM or replicate any commercial platform. It is simply an educational environment for practicing the investigation workflow without needing to deploy infrastructure first. The live training environment is available here: [https://socquery-lab.vercel.app/](https://socquery-lab.vercel.app/)
Cybercriminals are hijacking artificial intelligence (AI) user accounts via information stealer logs to create "stolen keys" that grant illicit access to tools from model providers like Google, Anthropic, and others. Information stealers like Lumma Stealer or Vidar are equipped to harvest a wide range of data from compromised systems. This can include credential, session tokens, and API
We’ve rewritten the module registry in workerd , the core open-source component of the Workers runtime, to be faster, more standards-compliant, and more closely aligned with Node.js' module registry. Over the past few years, we’ve been adding support for more and more Node.js runtime APIs. The Workers runtime now supports every stable API from Node.js that you might want to use in a serverless context, and these APIs are now enabled by default , letting you deploy even larger Node.js apps to Cloudflare (now up to 64 MiB on all plans — we’ve removed the limit on compressed bundle size). But API compatibility alone is not enough: Node.js applications also depend on how the runtime resolves, loads, and caches modules . ESM, CommonJS, and WebAssembly are each types of modules that you can import in your Worker’s code. The system within the runtime that handles all of this is called the module registry. You can start using it today by enabling the new_module_registry compatibility flag in your Worker.
A flaw in DeepSeek Harness, DeepSeek's open-source tool for running AI coding agents on a developer's machine, let a sandboxed agent turn off its own sandbox with a single command. The tool runs an agent's commands inside an operating-system sandbox, so that an agent working on untrusted files cannot write outside its workspace. The agent could remove that limit by calling the tool's own web
Fermat famously claimed to have a “truly marvelous proof” of his Last Theorem , but he never wrote it down, insisting the margin of his page was too narrow to contain it. A few centuries later, Anthropic announced a complete formalization of Fermat’s Last Theorem using 13 million lines of Lean code (clearly not what Fermat intended). Luckily, we found a wonderfully cursed Lean bug , shown below, that suggests the proof may have fit the margin after all. The issue affects all stable versions of Lean up to 4.33.1, and the patch is incorporated in v4.34.0-rc1. A “checked” proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem using Lean 4.33.1 The blue checkmarks in the screenshot above would suggest that Lean considers this proof correct. This seems odd given the amount of work Sir Andrew Wiles put into this problem and the vast size of Claude’s proof. So what is going on? The “proof” clearly doesn’t make any sense and exploits an issue in Lean. We found the issue while using GPT-5.6 to experiment with a new skill for code review. We want to clarify up front that the issue is not a kernel soundness issue , but it happens to nicely fit any discussion of strings, lengths, and substrings. &
**TL;DR.** The FortiPAM Chrome extension (1M+ users), used for Privileged Access Management, allowed any site to set the browser's proxy for the session, alongside allowing any site to create a new tab and send screen recordings of it to an attacker's server. That makes for trivial phishing attacks which only require the user to view something sensitive in the attacker-opened tab. CVSS 9.1 | [CVE-2026-84388](https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-84388).
Bitcoin wallet company Alby has warned of a critical flaw in Alby Hub that could have let an attacker take over a wallet and send its funds, but only where the owner had made the Hub reachable from the internet. Alby Hub is a self-hosted Lightning wallet, meaning the owner runs it on their own computer or server, and it holds their bitcoin. The flaw affects versions v1.7.0 through
I’ve spent enough time around AI adoption now to notice a pattern. Ask a business how AI is going for them and the honest answer is, lately, “we’ve got Copilot, and it’s not great.” That gap between the hype and the reality is exactly where Samantha North operates. Sam runs an AI transformation agency, helping […] The post AI adoption that pays off is built around keeping humans in the driver’s seat appeared first on Heimdal Security Blog .
U.S. cybersecurity and intelligence agencies have accused China-based artificial intelligence (AI) companies of conducting "systematic extraction" of proprietary functionalities and capabilities of American frontier models through distillation attacks. The activity has been described as occurring at an industrial-scale and one that forms the "core" of their AI development strategy, according to
cPanel has patched a flaw that it says lets a single hosting account take control of an entire server. An authenticated account holder with mail-related privileges can create files of their choosing on the server through EmailTrack and, from there, run code as the root user. cPanel published the advisory on September 8 and says every supported version of cPanel and WHM is affected.
Malware linked to break-ins at F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager appliances hides a PHP web shell in memory instead of in a file on disk, Sophos said in an analysis published on September 7. When Apache loads any of the three appliances' own PHP scripts, the malware adds the web shell to the copy held in memory, so a check of the file on disk can come back clean. Those three scripts are
The security researcher known as Chaotic Eclipse has dropped a proof-of-concept (PoC) for yet another zero-day in Microsoft Defender. The vulnerability, codenamed ShieldCrash, is assessed to be a patch bypass for CVE-2026-69414 (CVSS score: 7.8), also called ShieldBreak, which the researcher reported last month. "Microsoft has failed to properly patch ShieldBreak CVE-2026-69414," Chaotic
Microsoft Corp. today issued updates to plug at least 974 security holes in its Windows operating systems and other software, by far its biggest single patch batch ever. Microsoft says artificial intelligence is helping to speed the discovery of vulnerabilities, but security experts warn that many organizations already are struggling to prioritize the more human-intensive endeavor of testing and deploying so many fixes each month. Image: Shutterstock.com, Kirill Makarov. This month’s patch bundle obliterates the software giant’s previous record set in July , when it released updates for at least 570 security vulnerabilities. September’s Patch Tuesday brings this year’s total to more than 2,600, more than twice Microsoft’s previous record-setting patch year in 2020 (1,245) and with three more months to go. There are two “zero-day” flaws fixed this month that are being actively exploited: both CVE-2026-81963 and
Designed to compete with OpenClaw and Instinct, the company says Muse can do everything from sell your car to book you a plane ticket.
🔴 Redis cryptomining toolkit recovered from an open directory: XMRig deployment, fileless loader, chr()-encoded WordPress scripts
Researchers pulled 147 files off an open directory that was the operator's live working folder: Python exploit source, campaign logs, a bundled Python 3.11, and two exported Windows registry hives (SAM.save, SYSTEM.save, verified by the regf header). Worth a look: * Main technique abuses replication, not a bug. CONFIG SET dir/dbfilename, SLAVEOF to a rogue master, serve a crafted RDB on +FULLRESYNC. Blob opens with the REDIS0009 magic, then one key/value pair with an embedded newline before the cron text so the payload lands on its own line. Then SLAVEOF NO ONE and restore. * No client library. PING/CONFIG SET/SLAVEOF hand-serialized to raw RESP, length-aware reader, same two functions copied across every script. * Fileless loader is one line in \_boot.py that base64-decodes and exec()s an orchestrator in-process. Generous naming though, it writes the decoded target list and deployer back to disk as plaintext, so only the first stage stays off disk. * chr()-encoded literals in the WordPress scripts (chr(97)+chr(100)+... for "admin"), defeats naive keyword matching, control flow stays readable. * Three generations of verify payloads with bugfix comments left in. Two real bugs documented: a test cron written to a dotfile that run-parts silently skips, and a /dev/tcp payload that fails under dash. * Newest XMRig variant adds --tls-fingerprint pinning the pool cert, absent from earlier gens. SSH-via-AOF and a Lua EVAL sandbox probe are also in the kit, neither produced a confirmed compromise. Full write-up with IOCs and code: [https://hunt.io/blog/redis-cryptomining-botnet-3562-servers](https://hunt.io/blog/redis-cryptomining-botnet-3562-servers)
Overview The UEFI Shell program may expose raw memory access capabilities that, if present in platform firmware for debugging or advanced support use cases, could be abused to undermine UEFI Secure Boot protections. When the UEFI Shell is included in SPI flash, an attacker with the ability to modify UEFI boot configuration may be able to create multiple boot option entries and bypass controls intended to prevent the UEFI Shell from launching while Secure Boot is enabled. This could allow an attacker to modify the pre-boot environment and execute unauthorized software during system startup. Description The Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) is a firmware specification that defines the interface between a computing platform's hardware and operating system (OS) during the early boot process before the operating system is loaded. UEFI Secure Boot helps ensure that only trusted and digitally signed software is executed during these early stages of platform initialization. The TianoCore EDK II project provides an open-source reference implementation of the UEFI and Platform Initialization (PI) specifications. The project includes the UEFI Shell , which provides command-line utilities for debugging, diagnostics, and advanced platform management. Many OEM and Independent BIOS Vendor (IBV) firmware implementations include the UEFI Shell in SPI flash for service and support purposes. Because the shell executes in the pre-boot environment, it provides powerful commands such as dmem (display memory) and mm (memory modify) that can access physical memory. Many implementations include a boot entry for the
VU#859658: Skullcandy Dime 3 wireless earbuds contain an unauthenticated Bluetooth pairing vulnerability
Overview Skullcandy Dime 3 wireless earbuds, running firmware version 1.0.0.28, accept a new Bluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) pairing request from an unpaired device without requiring the earbuds to be placed into pairing mode or requiring any physical confirmation or interaction from the owner. Description The Skullcandy Dime 3 (Model S2DCW) wireless earbuds, running firmware version 1.0.0.28, accept a new Bluetooth Classic (BR/EDR) pairing request from a previously unpaired device without the device being placed into pairing mode by the owner and without physical confirmation on the earbuds. The device's Bluetooth PnP modalias identifies the chipset vendor as Airoha Technology Corp. (Bluetooth SIG company ID 0x0094). This vulnerability was previously disclosed in CVE-2025-20701 and is described as: In the Airoha Bluetooth audio SDK, there is a possible way to pair Bluetooth audio device without user consent. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. An attacker is required to be within Bluetooth radio range to the target earbuds, but no prior pairing, physical access, or interaction with the earbuds' buttons or case is required to exploit the vulnerability. A direct pairing request to the earbuds' known or discovered Bluetooth Classic address can be sent without a PIN, passkey, or physical confirmation. The pairing/bonding completes without owner action due to the device's NoInputNoOutput I/O capability. The firmware version displayed on the affected Skullcandy Dime 3 wireless earbuds is 1.0.0.28. Impact Once bonded, the attacker's device is added as a trusted device and can reconnect automatically whenever in range. This allows an attacker to est
VU#943094: ONLYOFFICE ownCloud integration plugin contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability
Overview A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Ascensio System SIA's ONLYOFFICE ownCloud integration plugin (version 9.12). The plugin’s backend endpoint does not adequately validate the user‑supplied document server URL before initiating outbound connections. An authenticated administrator can exploit this flaw to coerce the ownCloud server into issuing arbitrary network requests to attacker‑controlled destinations. Description The ownCloud ecosystem delivers a platform for enterprise file collaboration, providing capabilities for storing, syncing, and sharing data across devices. Ascensio System SIA's ONLYOFFICE provides a connector that integrates with ownCloud, enabling users to open and edit files directly within the cloud storage environment. When configuring the ONLYOFFICE document server within ownCloud, the plugin accepts a document server parameter and attempts to verify the supplied URL by initiating a connection directly from the ownCloud server. As detailed in CVE-2026-84282 , the application does not restrict or sanitize this parameter, allowing an authenticated administrator to provide arbitrary URLs, including internal network hosts or localhost addresses. By submitting crafted configuration requests to the /apps/onlyoffice/ajax/settings/address endpoint, an attacker can instruct the server to make outbound requests to internal systems that are otherwise inaccessible externally. Differences in returned error messages (such as connection failures versus SSL/TLS negotiation errors) enable the attacker to distinguish between open and closed TCP ports, facilitating internal network reconnaissance and port enumeration. The outbound requests originate from the ownCloud server, demonstrating server‑side request execution consistent with an SS
Automatic Key Exchange: faster, post-quantum secure origin handshakes for 45 billion daily connections (and counting)
Every time Cloudflare opens a new TLS 1.3 connection to an origin server, we have to make a guess: the protocol requires us to commit to a key agreement algorithm in the very first packet we send, before the origin has told us anything about itself or what it can support. If we guess right, the handshake completes in one round trip. Guess wrong, and the origin replies with a HelloRetryRequest , we start over, and the connection costs two round trips. For years, our guess was the same for every origin on the Internet: X25519 . Widely supported, but as it turns out, suboptimal for roughly 30% of the origin connections we've since measured. Today we're announcing Automatic Key Exchange , an extension of Automatic SSL/TLS that replaces the guess with a measurement. We probe each origin to learn which key agreement algorithms it supports and prefers, then lead with that algorithm on the first try, preferring the post-quantum hybrid X25519MLKEM768 wherever the origin can speak it. With the ongoing rollout of Automatic Key Exchange across origin connections, HelloRetryRequests fell from roughly 52% to 3.7%, cutting more than 150 ms off connection handshake latency at p90. In addition, as part of our ongoing rollout, hundreds of thousands of domains now
“You’ve been gifted a voucher!”. “Your account will be closed unless you act now”. “Late payment demand. Invoice # 207”. Phishing scams come in many shapes and sizes. And, in 2026, they remain, by far, the most common attack vector targeting both individuals and organizations. To help you understand the scale of the threat, I’ve […] The post Phishing in 2026. Latest statistics and analysis appeared first on Heimdal Security Blog .
Many security bugs are race conditions, where multi-threaded execution has to occur with the right interleaving for a negative effect to appear. This creates challenges for several use cases: Confirming bug candidates that have been discovered manually or through static analysis. Regression tests: After fixing a race condition bug, there is often no good way to write a regression test that reliably triggers the bug as part of a test suite. Automatic bug discovery, such as fuzzing: It is hard for a fuzzer to exercise all interesting interleavings of concurrent operations, or reach code paths that are only exercised when operations are racing.
Bose Sleepbuds II: Reverse-engineered the full BLE file-transfer protocol (TUMBLE) — audio codec still unidentified
The core components required to move from automated discovery to proven risk now exist: capable models, controlled execution, scalable orchestration, evidence capture and human judgement. The opportunity is to engineer them as one dependable system rather than treat each as a standalone feature. The post AI Can Find Vulnerabilities. Building a System That Proves Risk Is the Hard Part. appeared first on Synack .
To reduce the amount of noise from questions, we have disabled self-posts in favor of a unified questions thread every week. Feel free to ask any question about reverse engineering here. If your question is about how to use a specific tool, or is specific to some particular target, you will have better luck on the [Reverse Engineering StackExchange](http://reverseengineering.stackexchange.com/). See also /r/AskReverseEngineering.
Presently sponsored by: Report URI: Guarding you from rogue JavaScript! Don’t get pwned; get real-time alerts & prevent breaches #SecureYourSite I've started playing around with YouTube's "create video thumbnail", which hopefully will give me back a bit of time in my day (it used to be a manual job in Photoshop) and be a bit more interesting. And on that note, the imagery it's chosen this week is spot on: that Lockwood ES2100 electric strike looks like the perfect solution for my first fully installed Ubiquiti Access door lock. Having the door position sensor built in really simplifies things, and hopefully Ubiquiti will later add support to their hubs for the latch position and strike lock status. Once I'm back from this next round of travel, I should be able to do a full review of what it's like to actually live with.
Plus: Tens of millions of US and Canadian drivers’ licenses go up for sale on the dark web, the US military finally tries to tackle the risk online ad data poses to troops, and more.
Homeland Security Investigations agents hit the outdoor retailer with a controversial subpoena as part of a dragnet search for the identities of protesters who entered a Minnesota church in March.
ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok all suffered outages at nearly the exact same time for reasons that remain murky.
This week on Uncanny Valley, we dig into the latest prediction market buzz, Flock’s AI-powered police search tool, and how tech bros don’t know how to talk about “rouge” AI agents
Introducing context-aware vulnerability discovery and remediation with Cloudflare Managed Defense and OpenAI Daybreak models
Your scanner just flagged 4,000 new vulnerabilities, 78 of them critical. Which one do you fix first? To answer that question, Cloudflare is announcing early access to Vulnerability Discovery and Remediation, now part of Cloudflare Managed Defense . Vulnerability Discovery and Remediation is a new, invitation-only Cloudflare service that helps customers detect and mitigate vulnerabilities in their codebases. Through the OpenAI Daybreak Defense Network , we use OpenAI Daybreak models, including GPT-5.6 Cyber, for reconnaissance, hunting, and validation against codebases that you authorize us to access. If we detect a vulnerability, we will then propose solutions to you, automatically checking each proposed patch and any accompanying proposed mitigation before presenting them for review. Importantly, you are in the driver’s seat: while we may propose code patches and other mitigations, you decide whether they are implemented. Choosing what to fix first has always been hard. It's getting harder. Large language models can now surface weaknesses across a codebase in minutes , which means the number of findings keeps climbing. But the real problem is speed. Attackers can use AI to accelerate parts of vulnerability discovery and exploitation, giving security teams and developers less time to decide what matters and act on it. Imagine that your scanner tells you there's a vulnerability in a handler. It doesn't tell you whether that code is deployed. It doesn't tell you whether anyone is actually hitting that route, what security activity surrounds it, or what controls you already have